January 26, 2015

When wrong becomes the norm


From our overstocked archives

Sam Smith, 2013 - One of the hazards of being a long time journalist is that you get used to some people doing bad things but most other people not giving much of a damn. It used to piss me off but eventually I began to take it for granted. Now I sometimes describe my efforts as drawing animals on the walls of a Lascaux cave of our time. Maybe someone will find it; most likely they won’t.

Yet, like Quakers and existentialists, you can still witness, even if you’ve lost faith, because it is the only chance you have. You either defend justice and the right thing or you become their silent subverter. Besides, much of what is going wrong is happening in the penumbra of power. If you live far enough away, live a life well removed, and occupy your mind with distant thoughts, loves and occupations, there is still much that sadly you have lost, but you and those around you at least remain remarkably freer than those caught in the trap at the top.

Rummaging through the unrecycled trash heap of the First American Republic, there are little things that still surprise me. Not great catastrophes but trivial matters that also seem deeply revealing.

Like the refusal to let a German author into America because of what he had written about the NSA. Or the Seal kidnappings in countries that are members of the United Nations but which we now treat as if we’re the Chicago cops of the world and they are just part of the global ghetto. Or the Clintons thugging a documentary producer out of his efforts before Hillary Clinton has even announced her campaign.

Small but nasty stuff that most, from perps to media to public, now just take as normal –little indicators of how we have given up.

Part of the dirty little reason for this is because the people who used to stand up against such things are far more typically afraid. Churches don’t want to lose their members, universities their big bucks from government and corporations, reporters their jobs, non-profits their funding from foundations that have become co-conspirators with those they once challenged,

I have always been fascinated with stories about, and interviews with, major criminals. How can they possibly justify such a life style? How do they really feel when they kill someone? But over time what I have learned from these interviews is that all you have to do is redefine normal and evil becomes just another routine day. The very absence of concern is what lets them act the way they do.

This works as well in politics as with Whitey Bulger. Which is why dictatorships often do not need military force to have their way. All they have to do is to get people to shrug their shoulders and look someplace else. As the French say, “It exists.”

The big story of America’s past few decades has been the normalization of wrong. We have lost the sort of major leaders who might challenge it, tell us why it is wrong, and build alternatives.

To be sure, plenty of the less powerful are still on the case, but never in my lifetime have I seen such little support for a better way coming from places like Capitol Hill, churches, universities, and those folks who dub themselves “public intellectuals.”

But while I’m short on faith, I still have a few dreams, one of which is that some black, latino, labor, ecological, youth and women’s organizations will finally discover how to stop defending just their own back yard, and join together in a movement that will make the Tea Party seem a minor anachronism. The numbers are there, the will is waiting, and the soul is just slumbering awaiting the sound of joyous rebellion and creation.

Try it.

And if you need me, you can find me in one of those caves painting animals on the wall.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

But exactly how much change are you willing to sign up for, Sam?

My sense, having read what you've written here and in your "Repair Manual", is that you're a classic "liberal", willing to tweak the edges but implicitly supportive of even a bad status quo because anything more than tweaking is (Phil Ochs) "going too far".

But Jefferson foresaw the situation we're in, and wrote about it during the Revolution (specifically in the context of the vicious theocratic laws of the time, but with general applicability): It can never be too often repeated, that the time for fixing every essential right on a legal basis is while our rulers are honest, and ourselves united.

From the conclusion of this [Revolutionary] war we shall be going down hill. It will not then be necessary to resort every moment to the people for support. They will be forgotten, therefore, and their rights disregarded. They will forget themselves, but in the sole faculty of making money, and will never think of uniting to effect a due respect for their rights.

The shackles, therefore, which shall not be knocked off at the conclusion of this war, will remain on us long, will be made heavier and heavier, till our rights shall revive or expire in a convulsion. [Query XVII, Notes on the State of Virginia]

I hope I'm wrong (you can't imagine how much I hope I'm wrong), but we might have now reached the point where our only remaining choices are "a convulsion" or extinction.

Earth's climate is being destroyed by human action, specifically the actions of the feudal system (currently instantiated as Capitalism).

We cannot survive its destruction, so we have to, among other changes, replace Capitalism with a non-feudal system and reduce the global human population by limiting reproduction, thus avoiding (if we're lucky) the famines, plagues, and wars that will otherwise ensue. The knock-on effects will gradually revert the climate changes.

To make such changes we must have political power.

But the Constitution was written specifically to prevent our getting political power, and the few political rights supposedly guaranteed to us by the Constitution have all --even the Third-- been at least infringed and in some cases hollowed out til they no longer function.

That leaves us very little wiggle room to effect change without Jefferson's "convulsion". We have to try, but we'd better be prepared to "convulse".

Machiavelli wrote that there is nothing more dangerous or uncertain of success than to try to make major changes in how things work, since the ones who support the current system will be our bitter enemies while most of those who desire change will fear to offer more than lukewarm support.

So where do you stand on the continuum, Sam?